Example of a claim in a speedy trial New regulations – easy and simple

An example of a claim in a speedy trial. New regulations can help you understand how to correctly write a claim in a speedy trial (previously the procedure was called Quick justice).

The difference between a claim in a fast-track trial and a claim in a regular trial is that a fast-track trial only deals with claims up to 75,000 shekels, and a regular trial deals with claims over 75,000 shekels.

על מנת למנוע בלבול מובהר כי תביעה קטנה אינה תביעה בסדר דין מהיר, למרות שתביעה קטנה מוגבלת לסך של 38,900 ש"ח. תביעה קטנה זהו הליך נפרד ושונה שמתנהל בSmall Claims Court Compared to a fast-track lawsuit that is conducted within the framework Magistrate's Court.

Another thing to consider is that a lawsuit filed in a speedy trial must be accompanied by an affidavit from the plaintiff, a list of documents, and according to one of the latest amendments, also List of witnesses.

The advantage of a fast-track lawsuit is that it is a faster procedure. Defense Such a claim must be filed within 45 days of receipt of the claim, and not Within 60 days As should be filed after receiving a claim in a regular court procedure (Example of a defense brief in a speedy trial).

Example of a claim in a speedy trial New regulations

Regarding:

The plaintiff:

שם ושם משפחת התובע, ת"ז: _____________
________ Street, City 
Tel: __________________ 
ע"י עוה"ד אדי בליטשטיין
13 HaHagana St. (Yaron Miller Tower, Office 501) 
Tel: 03-6427876; Fax: 077-4704697 
דוא"ל: [email protected]

N G D

Defendant:

Defendant's name, H.P. ________________
___________ St., City

A statement of claim in a speedy hearing

Essence of the claim: Supplier – Customer, Contracts, Other Finance 
Requested remedies: פיצוי כספי 50,000 ש"ח.
Court fee amount: 1250 ש"ח (625 ש"ח במועד זה לפי תקנה 6(א) ופרט 1 לתקנות בתי המשפט (אגרות), תשס"ז -2007).
The existence of an additional procedure: As far as the plaintiff knows, there is no further proceeding in court regarding that factual tract.

Summons

Since the plaintiff filed this lawsuit against you, you are invited to file a defense within 45 days of the date this summons was served on you.

לתשומת לבך, אם לא תגיש כתב הגנה אזי לפי תקנה 130 לתקנות סדר הדין האזרחי, התשע"ט-2018, תהיה לתובע הזכות לקבל פסק דין שלא בפניך.

A concise description of the litigants

1. The plaintiff is a private individual, born in ________, who purchased a new, luxurious vehicle from the defendant.
2. The defendant is a company that imports and markets vehicles in Israel, manufactured by the company _______.

The relief sought in summary

• פיצוי כספי בסך 50 אלף ש"ח:
• 29,250 ש"ח החזר הוצאות משפט בהן נאלץ התובע לשאת.
• 20,250 ש"ח בגין עוגמת נפש ואובדן הנאה מרכבו החדש.
• 500 ש"ח בגין החזר עבור תשלום לגרר, שגרר את רכבו התקול של התובע למוסך הנתבעת.

Summary of the facts necessary to establish the cause of action and when it arose

• The plaintiff purchased a new, luxurious vehicle from the defendant for an amount close to 200,000 shekels.
• Very shortly after receiving the vehicle, and while the plaintiff was driving the vehicle, the metal part connecting the steering wheel to the vehicle's chassis broke. Miraculously, the plaintiff escaped an accident that could have easily led to his injury or even worse.
• The plaintiff was forced to tow the vehicle to the defendant's garage at his own expense, where he announced that he was canceling the deal. The garage informed the plaintiff that canceling the deal was not on the agenda.
• התובע נאלץ לשכור את שירותיו של בא כוחו, ושילם לו 29,250 ש"ח לצורך ניהול משא ומתן לפני תביעה ו/או הגשת תביעה לצורך ביטול העסקה וקבלת פיצוי כספי.
• רק לאחר התערבותו של ב"כ התובע, ולאחר מו"מ ממושך הנתבעת השיבה לתובע את התשלום בגין הרכב. יחד עם זאת, הנתבעת סירבה לפצות את התובע בגין נזקיו.
• Hence the lawsuit.

The facts that give the court jurisdiction

1. לבית המשפט הנכבד הסמכות העניינית והמקומית לדון בתביעה זו לאור סכום התביעה ומקום עסקה של הנתבעת (רכישת הרכב נעשתה בסניף הנתבעת בראשון לציון), בהתאם לתקנה 7(א) תקנות סדר הדין האזרחי, תשע"ט – 2018.

Details of the allegations

1. At the end of April 2024, the plaintiff ordered a _______________ model vehicle from the defendant.
2. The vehicle was actually delivered to the plaintiff at the end of May 2024.
3. Just a few days after the vehicle was delivered, on May 28, 2024, During the plaintiff's tripThe metal part connecting the vehicle wheel to the vehicle chassis broke.

Appendix 1: Photos taken by the plaintiff illustrating the fracture.

1. It should be emphasized that the plaintiff made normal use of the vehicle, and the vehicle was not damaged in any way, certainly not through the plaintiff's fault, before the incident occurred.
2. Only by a miracle did the plaintiff survive an accident that could easily have led to serious injury, or even worse.
3. התובע יצר קשר עם מוסך הנתבעת וזה הנחה אותו להוביל את הרכב למוסך. התובע נאלץ לשלם על כך 500 ש"ח.

Appendix 2: חשבונית מס המעידה על תשלום 500 ש"ח בגין גרירת הרכב.

1. Even such a simple matter as towing the vehicle turned out to be a complex task because when the vehicle was received, the plaintiff was not provided with the vehicle's license. Without it, the tow truck did not agree to tow the vehicle, and only after the plaintiff contacted the defendant's representatives again and demanded to receive it, was a copy of the vehicle's license sent to him.
2. After the plaintiff took the vehicle to the garage, he asked for an explanation of how such a serious malfunction could occur in such an expensive and prestigious vehicle. And more while travelingThe garage couldn't explain it.
3. While still at the garage, the plaintiff announced that he was no longer interested in the vehicle and that he wanted to cancel the deal, in light of the concern that it was not a quality vehicle and that it might have additional defects that could endanger his life or the lives of his family members. It was explained to the plaintiff that the issue of canceling the deal was not at all on the agenda.
4. בתאריך 2.6.2024 (יום ראשון, אחרי סופ"ש שבו הרכב עדיין שהה במוסך) התובע נאלץ לשכור את שירותיו של בא כוחו על מנת לנהל מו"מ מול הנתבעת ו/או להגיש תביעה לבית המשפט על מנת לקבל צו לביטול העסקה וקבלת פיצוי כספי. בגין שירותי בא כוחו שילם התובע 29,250 ש"ח.

Appendix 3: חשבונית מס מטעם בא כוח התובע על סך 29,250 ש"ח.

• On the same day, the plaintiff's attorney sent the defendant a warning letter and notice of the cancellation of the transaction. As part of this letter, the defendant was required to return all of the plaintiff's money and compensation in the amount of 50,000 shekels.
• Shortly after sending the letter, the plaintiff was contacted and informed that his vehicle had been repaired and he was invited to come and pick it up. The plaintiff refused in light of the letter sent on behalf of his attorney. The mere fact that the vehicle was repaired without the plaintiff being required to pay a single shekel indicates that the damage was not caused by the plaintiff's fault, and therefore the vehicle was repaired free of charge under the manufacturer's warranty.
• רק לאחר התערבות בא כוח התובע, הנתבעת הסכימה לנהל מו"מ, אשר נמשך למעלה מחודש ימים ובסיומו הצדדים הגיעו להסכמה על ביטול העסקה והשבת כספים לתובע. רק ביום 10.7.2024 הכספים הושבו בפועל לתובע.

Appendix 4: Reference for the transfer of funds from the defendant to the plaintiff.

• על אף המו"מ הממושך שניהלו ב"כ הצדדים, הנתבעת סירבה לשלם לתובע ולו שקל אחד As compensation.
• The plaintiff believes that he is entitled to receive financial compensation from the defendant in light of the expenses he incurred. Without the intervention of his attorney, the defendant did not agree to the cancellation of the transaction.
• Furthermore, the plaintiff, a man approaching the age of ______, was certainly caused mental anguish and loss of enjoyment of his new vehicle. The plaintiff invested the best of his money in purchasing a new and luxurious vehicle, but the vehicle he was provided with was so defective that it led to a life-threatening malfunction. The plaintiff did not want an identical replacement vehicle because he had lost faith in ______ vehicles and chose to purchase a vehicle from another company.
• We must also take into account the fact that the plaintiff's money was actually returned to him more than a month after the date of sending the demand to cancel the transaction, which prevented him from purchasing a replacement vehicle immediately. In addition, the plaintiff will now have to purchase a replacement vehicle from another company and wait a considerable amount of time for it (there is currently no immediate supply of new vehicles, and the defendant also provided the plaintiff with the vehicle after a month), which increases the plaintiff's mental anguish.
• There is also no reason why the plaintiff should be forced to pay out of pocket for towing the vehicle due to a malfunction resulting from a defect in the defendant's vehicle, and the defendant must also reimburse this payment.

In conclusion

• In light of all of the above, the Honorable Court is hereby requested to summon the defendant to a hearing before it and to rule as follows:
• the remedies detailed in this statement of claim.
• לחייב את הנתבעת בתשלום הוצאות משפט ושכר טרחת עו"ד בתוספת מע"מ.
• To grant any other relief that the Honorable Court deems appropriate in the circumstances of the case.

_______________
עו"ד אדי בליטשטיין
ב"כ התובע